» 您尚未登录:请 登录 | 注册 | 标签 | 帮助 | 小黑屋 |


发新话题
打印

2012貌似杯具了

引用:
原帖由 fhrrr 于 2009-11-10 12:29 发表
不至于把,目前烂番茄83%好评率,对这种卖特效的片子,已经是非常不错的表现了
呵呵,你和楼主的分歧在于:楼主是看影评人的,你是看烂番茄的大众评分的,因为目前烂番茄的影评人评分还没有出来。

这片子我估计看的人还是会不少的,无论如何,特效能够值回票价的。


TOP

从《综艺》的Todd Maccarthy的影评来看,这次《2012》虽然是差评,但特效不会让人失望的,索尼影业准备数钱就是了:

The notion of playing God is implicit in the job of a film director, and rarely has the sense of a wrathful, vengeful deity at the helm, albeit a pagan one, been so comprehensively felt as in "2012.'' For demolition maestro Roland Emmerich, "Independence Day,'' "Godzilla'' and "The Day After Tomorrow'' were mere appetizers for the lip-smacking smorgasbord of global annihilation laid out here. This simultaneously spectacular and risible concoction looks likely to trigger a worldwide B.O. tsunami for Sony.

破坏专家罗兰德·埃默里奇之前的什么《独立日》,《哥斯拉》和《明日之后》跟《2012》的全球毁灭性灾难一比,全都成了开胃小菜。本片集合了壮观的视觉特效和不乏幽默的剧情,对于索尼影业来说,很有可能来一次全球的票房海啸。

Todd Maccarthy向来是尖酸刻薄,挑剔透顶的人,对一部特效片有这样的评价已经可以了,超过暑期所有片子的特效应该是没什么问题的了。

所以大家不必担忧,尽量去影院看吧。

Except for some patchy work when St. Peter's crumbles, the visual effects are pretty sensational, delivering the cutting-edge CGI goods auds want and expect. It will be hard to watch "Earthquake'' ever again after this one.

[ 本帖最后由 seablue 于 2009-11-11 09:14 编辑 ]



TOP

虽然Todd对狗血的剧情不感冒,不过这都是扯淡,毁灭才是大家想看的,不是吗?

On any level other than as sheer visual sensation, "2012'' is a joke, for the simple reason that it has no point of view; the film offers no philosophical, metaphysical, intellectual and certainly no religious perspective on the cataclysm, just the physical frenzy of it all. But to ask this would be taking the picture far too seriously. Or not.


TOP

发新话题
     
官方公众号及微博