一图流

Here's the thing: if you wanted to, you could install, say, Visual Studio on the Surface 3. You can't do that on an iPad, no matter how well it scores in benchmarks. I tried it out. Building the Boost C++ library using the Visual Studio 2013 compilers on Surface 3 took about 30 minutes. The Surface Pro 3, with its faster processor and faster disk, managed it in about 11 minutes. But the Surface 3 could still do it. It worked. The Surface 3 isn't going to be the best developer workstation ever made, but it will be a functional one. I've done real, paying work on slower machines. Is this good enough for a student machine, a cheap spare system, or a highly portable system for taking on the road? Without a doubt, especially in the 4GB iteration.

[ 本帖最后由 kenkiller1 于 2015-4-16 16:26 编辑 ]

买买买~

posted by wap, platform: Firefox
看着不错
你测试源地址发来看看啊

  能不能叫软粉跟果粉都选个代表出来，要肱二头肌发达的，捧着自家的pad，看谁能连续捧500分钟

posted by wap, platform: 华为
定位不一样吧，笔记本续航这么多算是很牛逼了，当然重量也很可观

性能测试方面， 性能比起sp3 还是有不足的地方，但是平常的office 3件套是毫无压力的。

CPU多核性能是SP3 i5 4300U的62%左右，估计比i3y版本稍差一点。
单核性能相当于i5 的32%
GPU性能相当于SP3集显HD4400的60%左右
磁盘性能，4k随机读写13MB/10MB, 连续读写114MB/44MB
电池续航wifi上网9小时，比SP3长一小时

http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2 ... wer-cheaper-better/

老外测试的，大家看看吧，具体还是要等实体产品上市。

[ 本帖最后由 kenkiller1 于 2015-4-16 16:36 编辑 ]

我只能说苏菲P的续航肯定不行，目测假

posted by wap, platform: iPhone
按生命周期应该sp3比s3好一点，而且sp3在x宝才4xxx起，s3没啥竞争力

posted by wap, platform: iPhone
宁愿加点钱买pro

posted by wap, platform: Nokia
作为苏菲p3用户表示，对图上的续航严重怀疑

引用:

原帖由 kenkiller1 于 2015-4-16 16:21 发表
Here's the thing: if you wanted to, you could install, say, Visual Studio on the Surface 3. You can't do that on an iPad, no matter how well it scores in benchmarks. I tried it out. Building the Boost ...

什么都能做，就是什么都做不好……

posted by wap, platform: GOOGLE Nexus 5

引用:

原帖由 @查理王  于 2015-4-16 18:09 发表
作为苏菲p3用户表示，对图上的续航严重怀疑

你看看你是不是用ie以外的浏览器

引用:

原帖由 查理王 于 2015-4-16 18:09 发表
posted by wap, platform: Nokia
作为苏菲p3用户表示，对图上的续航严重怀疑

Chrome使坏 Windows笔记本耗电量骤增


伊恩莫里斯（Ian Morris）在福布斯上发表了一篇文章指出，喜欢使用谷歌Chrome浏览器的Windows用户会在无意之中破坏他们的计算机电池。问题出在系统时钟速率上。在默认状态下，Windows PC的系统时钟速率为15.625毫秒，这就意味着处理器每秒要“醒来”64次。但是运行Chrome浏览器会将系统时钟速率改成1毫秒，这意味着处理器每秒要“醒来”1000次

sp3用户表示续航基本符合，用电老虎chrome另说，osx下chrome也是一个尿性。。