http://www.usgamer.net/articles/oh-so-thats-nintendos-next-move
   
Curiously, the 2DS is even more of a tablet-style system than it appears at first glance, as it actually features a single large screen in its center, not two separate ones. As one of their cost-cutting design measures, Nintendo reduced the number of screens in the system from two to one, and the appearance of separate screens is merely simulated by the way the case masks out the extraneous portions. This means the entire screen is by necessity a touchscreen, with the upper screen protected by a layer of plastic that sits above it. While this makes no difference for the system's normal functions -- after all, neither the system's firmware or its software would recognize the hidden, inactive zones of the screen or the upper portion's touch capabilities, even if you exposed those portions -- I'm curious to see what hardware modders manage to do with the system.

2ds的双屏是由一块大屏构成的，为了节省成本减掉了一块屏，整块屏都是触摸屏，但是“上屏”被一层透明塑料覆盖着的，无法触摸，所以在触摸的功能上和3ds是一致的，只有下屏能触摸。
所以这货没有设计成翻盖的

[ 本帖最后由 madrista7 于 2013-8-29 08:48 编辑 ]

创新设计

拆开面盖合二为一就变成NitendoPAD了是不是这道理，任地狱平板最终现真身血洗平板界

以后可以通过刮去塑料限制解除开创新玩法。。。。？

也就是说本身是一块400x512分辨率的液晶屏，外壳是一个物理遮罩？


[ 本帖最后由 BigBangBang 于 2013-8-29 10:07 编辑 ]

posted by wap, platform: GALAXY S III

1块屏就不能叫ds了，GBE重出江湖

拆过DS的应该都知道触摸和显示屏是分开的...
如果要节省成本直接只在下面部分贴触摸屏就是了(难道还会在对位之类的问题上有困难么...还是为了统一上下屏的亮度)
单纯按照逻辑想的话没必要拿上屏折腾（而且多一层触摸屏光透率也会下降）
LZ的原文是确切消息还是单纯通过“只有一块(显示)屏”推断出来的说法？

那还不如拼一起的
那个什么雷顿7只能看半截真难看

一块屏被分割为两块显示区域？

还有DPI、像素形状以及屏幕对应大小的问题

我觉得这事还真不好说。。

真有真的理由，假有假的道理。。。。。

等拆机，笑喷了，这不只是外形设计师的智商问题了，而是整个任天堂的智商问题

posted by wap, platform: Chrome

2SS啊

posted by wap, platform: iPhone

创新的设计，再一次被老任折服中

新玩法牛逼啊。。。哈哈哈。。。