[家电] 一篇激光背投的文章

原文结论：
After a few hours of playing with two of the hottest HDTVs on the block, we decided to call it a day. My eyes were worn out, probably from being cooked by three different flavors of laser all morning, but I became intimate enough with Mitsubishi's flagship TV to voice my opinions about why you might want to think about setting up a date with the LaserVue.

After much discussion and wandering thought of the subject, we came to agreement about who this TV is for right now. If you are the kind of guy (or girl) who has to have the latest in tech, no matter what the cost - an early adopter, a frequent flyer on the bleeding edge - you'd be wise to take a closer look at the LaserVue. The picture quality is fantastic across the board, from unruly action flicks to serene, Sunrise Earth-like films.

And the colors. You're not going to find a set that is capable of displaying colors quite like this one. If you're a Nebraska fan or you cheer for a team sporting a cardinal for a mascot, you're set. If George A. Romero's film collection never leaves your Blu-Ray player, or you're a Republican, you'll love the LaserVue.

That's not to say that the LaserVue is the best HDTV display ever. That's a highly subjective designation, as we found from discussing the matter with Bjorn's staff, who eat, sleep, and breath high-end A/V gear. Some of them were smitten with the LaserVue's all-around picture quality. A few others still thought the Kuro was the set to beat. They talked about the tremendous black level capabilities and value-added features of Pioneer's plasma jewel in comparison to the Mitsubishi's average (for this price range) feature set and not-quite-as-deep blacks.


功率：
The Kuro 60" plasma requires 524W for operation; a Sharp Aquos 65" LCD requires 525W; Mitsubishi's 65" LaserVue TV only needs 135W.

除了功率差别比较大，其他各有所长吧。不知道价格多少？

[ 本帖最后由 ppst 于 2008-10-22 08:51 编辑 ]