挖掘能力太差.

http://www.36kr.com/androids-dir ... rn-rates-are-30-40/

从目前智能手机市场的销售情况来看，随着时间的推移，Android系统的手机销量将会大大超过iOS系统手机的销量。然而，Android手机制造商目前却面临着一个十分尴尬的困境，因为一些Android手机的退货率竟然在30%至40%之间，令人咋舌。相比之下，iPhone4手机在2010的退货率仅为1.7%，差距可见一斑。

我们昨天报道过，三星手机今年第二季度的销量在1800万至2100万之间，季销量已超过Nokia和Apple。经过这其中包括Bada系统的手机，但其中大部分为Android系统手机。搭载Android系统的Galaxy S II手机推出仅55天，就卖出300万部。

据一位熟悉不同手机制造商的人士透露，三星的一些Android系统手机的退货率高达40%。不同的用户对Android这个平台和其可用性的了解有着很大的差异。

对于这方面的行家来说，Android系统具有很大的优越性，它表面上是一个完全开放的平台（其实不然），这也就为程序员，运营商以及用户带来了更大的灵活性。

而对那些普通用户来说，Android就像一个迷宫。很多用户买Android系统手机的目的就是为了体验这种新鲜玩意，然而，当他们真正发现了Android系统手机与iPhone或Blackberry手机的巨大差异时，他们失望了。

Android系统手机的与众不同加速了其销量的增长，也正是由于这种不同，Android手机的退货率才如此之高。

via TC

http://techcrunch.com/2011/07/26 ... -returns-are-30-40/

Android’s Dirty Secret: Shipping Numbers Are Strong But Returns Are 30-40%

John Biggs posted 19 hours agoCommentsView Author Page I’m on about.me Biggs is the editor of TechCrunch Gadgets. Biggs has written for the New York Times, InSync, USA Weekend, Popular Mechanics, Popular Science, Money and a number of other outlets on technology and wristwatches. He is the former editor-in-chief of Gizmodo.com and lives in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn. You can Tweet him here and G+ him here. → Learn More

  
It’s generally accepted that, on the aggregate, Android device sales will far outpace iOS sales year after year. However, there’s a dirty little secret about Android devices that most manufacturers are facing: the return rate on some Android devices is between 30 and 40 percent, in comparison to the iPhone 4′s 1.7% return rate as of Antennagate in 2010.

As we learned yesterday, Samsung is selling 18 to 21 million phones this quarter. Although all of those won’t be Android phones – Samsung manufactures Bada phones as well for the low-end. We do know for sure that the Galaxy S II sold 3 million in 55 days, a strong showing.

However, on the ground, many return rates are approaching 40% said a person familiar with handset sales for multiple manufacturers. Why? Well, as Matt noted, consumer understanding of the platform and handset availability is massively bifurcated.

For us nerds, Android makes a lot of sense. It’s ostensibly open platform (but not really) that offers far more flexibility to the programmer, carrier, and, ideally, the user.

For the “average” phone user, however, Android is a maze. Anecdotally, I’ve heard of multiple examples of folks who bought an Android phone in order to “Think Different” and came away disappointed when faced with the glaring differences between Android and a friend’s iPhone or Blackberry.

Sure, the Android hardware ecosystem is more variegated and expansive and sure, Android is free for carriers to implement (in general) but clearly it’s the little differences that are driving sales and, more important, returns.

引用:

原帖由 jun4rui 于 2011-7-27 14:23 发表
好吧，其它都是大同小异的评论了，这样一篇愚蠢的文章都有人洗地，真是想不到TG还有智商如此低的人啊。

欢迎大家去LS提供的原文瞻仰被无数评论鞭尸的原文，顺便谢谢LS提供的原文地址。

你说的洗地的TG低智商的人是谁啊？我看了楼上各位也没有谁为黑而黑啊，你不会说的是我吧。
我有做任何评论吗？你自己引用了新闻，说不知道出处，我正好知道来源,就贴出来而已。
我早就看到这个新闻了,自己对这个新闻也持保留意见，就没有贴到TG来。

作者原文标题就是“Android’s Dirty Secret”，肯定有偏向性的。

你自己找不痛快贴出来233，说谁智商低啊。

[ 本帖最后由 阿道 于 2011-7-27 14:50 编辑 ]