引用:

原帖由 qyqgpower 于 2014-3-7 17:25 发表
posted by wap, platform: iPhone

求苹果说3.5、4寸是最适合人类手掌的原文出处

随便google了下
发现了更多有趣的东西……

http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/02/steve-jobs/
点链接可以看到Steve Jobs及其代表的苹果公司更多打脸内容

2010年谈到7寸平板必死时说：“7寸平板应该自带砂纸，用户把手指磨小就能用了”
http://thenextweb.com/apple/2010 ... -down-their-fingers

2010年谈到大屏幕的猴机：3.5寸是最好的（在自传中也提到过，有自传的同学请检查下gizmodo和engadget的说的是否正确）
http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/ ... to-buy-a-big-phone/

引用:

He mentioned it publicly and in his biography. He believed Apple already had the perfect format. According to his own words, the company worked for years on finding just the right ratio, and they found that 3.5 inches was the optimal and most comfortable size. The one and only size. He even joked that 4-inch Android phones looked like skateboards.

听起来Steve Jobs像是在自己喷粪然后又出尔反尔把自己的屎给吃了，但我觉得这恰恰是一个成功的商人的牛逼之处
难道他应该在ipod没有摄像头的时候说ipod就应该有摄像头，只是我们现在没加入而已
或者在iphone还是3.5寸的侏儒机时代告诉大家，ok，我们的产品线将在两年之后跨入4寸

引用quora一位兄弟的话：

引用:

Apple under Jobs was exceptional at delivering products that were just the right balance of features, design, and price to become ubiquitous.  As a result it's tempting to look at Jobs' public statements to try to see what else he predicted or when he was wrong.  

But Jobs' incentive when making such statements was never to be right; it was to promote his company.  If Apple wasn't in a certain product category, his role as CEO was to say -- at least publicly -- that product category was unnecessary, bad, and doomed to failure.  Even if Apple planned to enter that category, remember that Apple was/is notoriously secretive; it hardly ever hints at roadmaps for future products.

Jobs' public statements should be interpreted as what they likely were intended to be: marketing.

最后对把Steve Jobs为了卖出劣等产品而说出的出尔反尔的话奉为神明的人表示同情。

引用:

原帖由 banditcat 于 2014-3-9 09:26 发表
posted by wap, platform: iOS

说了这么多，iphone在美国将近三分之一的市占率，这产品到底好用么？

非常好用，iOS对大部分不喜欢钻研电子产品的普通用户尤其友好