posted by wap, platform: iPhone

从来没有人说什么吊盐水瓶好。
只是每种设计都有它好的一面和不好的一面。很显然一体化设计带来的好处大过偶尔不能换电池的不便。而且你自己也说了，随便找个咖啡厅休息半小时就能解决，这显然不是什么大问题。

posted by wap, platform: iPhone

引用:

原帖由 @洒家又回来了  于 2013-1-12 08:14 发表
喷了，你说的还少了吗？

我说的是一体化设计带来的好处远比不能换电池带来的不便要大得多。
你要是看不懂或者选择性失明那我也没办法。

posted by wap, platform: iPhone

引用:

原帖由 @jinye2001  于 2013-1-12 10:32 发表
除了美观，做防水方便外
想不出了

更加坚固，防尘。

posted by wap, platform: iPhone

对了，还有最重要的一点：如果方便换电池，外壳就要是塑料的，因为金属外壳没法作卡槽。

引用:

原帖由 洒家又回来了 于 2013-1-12 13:23 发表

http://club.tgfcer.com/thread-6598564-1-1.html
抽，继续抽
用了3部棒子可换电池手机了，还真没有发现哪进灰吗？

请看37楼。

posted by wap, platform: iPhone

引用:

原帖由 @cf3b5  于 2013-1-12 15:07 发表
无语，假如我找到金属外壳并且可以换电池的手机，你是不是负责吃掉它！

请你举一款手机的例子，我是没见过。
最好是能展示下它是怎么做金属电池盖的。

The Reason Why Apple Uses Integrated Battery Designs


If we believe the vision for Apple expressed by Steve Jobs, it's all about technology leading to the experience.

They are foremost about a cohesive experience that is enabled by technology. That would mean that the primary purpose of the non-removable battery in Apple's gadgets is not to annoy you, or to deliver additional revenues to Apple stores. The purpose would be experience, right?



Well, that is what an Apple patent filing that describes an "integrated embedded battery" appears to outline as well. The patent claim simply explains "a plurality of battery cells, wherein each battery cell is directly attached to a housing for enclosing operational components of the portable computing device, […] wherein the protective structure is configured to protect the battery cell from a compressive force applied to the housing of the portable computing device, the protective structure being attached to or integral with the housing and having a height greater than that of each of the battery cells."

However, the background description of the filed patent is much more revealing. In fact, the reasoning behind Apple's embedded battery is a great example of Apple's thinking behind the design of its products. Apple explains that the design of compact portable computing devices means that there can be "complex tradeoffs" and notes that the battery may be such a tradeoff. The design of the device can affect the battery in its general type, its energy density, durability and packaging.

As a result, Apple says that its embedded battery is a solution for a "portable computing device that is durable, lightweight and efficiently packaged." The description of this specific embedded battery shows an extraordinary amount of attention to the goal of supporting the design of the device as experiences by the user. For example, there are structural "ribs' that protect the battery from compression, but are lighter than a structure that would need to be present were the battery removable.

For replacement purposes, the battery was designed - even if consumers cannot replace the battery themselves, for easy removal: "As the battery cells are not enclosed in a separate pack, they are therefore easily accessible. Thus, the lack of a separate pack makes it easier to identify and repair or replace faulty battery cell. A removal mechanism, such as a pull tab or a removal handle, can be attached to the battery cell to facilitate removal of a battery cell that needs to be repaired or replaced."

引用:

原帖由 cf3b5 于 2013-1-12 17:58 发表

是不是我展示一部金属电池盖的手机，你就把这个手机吃了！？
求公证……

是不是我展示一部学苹果一体化设计的手机你就把这手机吃了？

引用:

原帖由 heyfly 于 2013-1-12 20:03 发表
里程碑就是金属后盖的，这当年也是街机啊

这是金属后盖？
http://detail.zol.com.cn/picture ... 938_0_p234082.shtml

posted by wap, platform: iPhone

引用:

原帖由 @cf3b5  于 2013-1-12 21:25 发表
你根本不需要展示，我从没否认过电池一体化设计的手机存在，我只是认为这种不能拆卸电池的设计不太好用而已！
反倒是你否认存在金属后盖的可拆卸电池的手机而已！
所以……等着吃手机把……

我什么时候说不存在了？我只说我没见过，这叫不存在？
你觉得不太好，你算老几？人家大公司的顶级设计师都陆续模仿这设计，人家不比你想得多？人家手机还没你用得多？还没你忙？
你身为一个理工科行业的人还得出这傻逼言论，真是白混了。

本帖最后由 ffcactus 于 2013-1-13 00:14 通过手机版编辑

posted by wap, platform: iPhone

引用:

原帖由 @鬼冢英吉  于 2013-1-12 21:32 发表
这真是金属后盖……

你不会连里程碑都没见过吧

我没见过。不过前面已经有人已经展示过了，那这种金属电池盖的产品确实是存在的。但从图片上看这种设计比较累赘，在如今手机内部空间寸土寸金的时代这种设计未必还可取。我很难想象象iPhone5这么纤薄的手机如何运用这样的盖子。
不过我转的那英文说明基本上解释了为什么苹果采用一体化设计了。这是苹果的一项专利技术。大概是说这样可以给用户带来更好的电池。我猜可能是如果电池是可随意拆卸的话，各种指标的要求会更高，限制了电池的选择。

引用:

原帖由 heyfly 于 2013-1-13 11:51 发表


没见过里程碑就不要说这句话，不论是本身还是卡勾，给机身增加的厚度都不到半毫米，好好看看我上面给的那张图，上面有4个卡勾的，里程碑后盖的设计是有史以来最轻薄的、最省空间的后盖设计之一，说不定之一都可以 ...

比一体化设计的iPhone5还轻薄还省空间？ 你这不是睁眼瞎嘛。