posted by wap, platform: Samsung
好看死了，12月10日出uhd蓝光再看一遍

posted by wap, platform: Samsung

引用:

原帖由 @foxandfox  于 2019-11-27 09:19 PM 发表
我觉得还挺好看的。

而且对战李小龙那场，也不算是压倒性胜利。

第一局有点大意被小龙踢倒，第二局摔飞小龙，第三局打的你来我往。

结果被动作演员选角导演开掉，小龙在旁边也没说啥。

再结合最后冷静轻松击败鞋教三人组来看(太轻松导致挨了一刀)，和小龙打平手，也说的过去。

小李子也说了，他可是战争英雄！

war hero，刚看第一滴血（第一部），里面警察说兰博也是war hero

本帖最后由 grammyliu 于 2019-11-28 00:03 通过手机版编辑

posted by wap, platform: Samsung

引用:

原帖由 @S.UNDAY  于 2019-12-7 10:57 AM 发表
说白了就是看你在看电影前是不是知道波兰斯基的灭门案这件事。
知道的话全程都是紧张的，因为你会完全明白为什么嬉皮士会出场，为什么会给波兰斯基和他老婆分出那么多镜头，看中间皮特独闯嬉皮士老巢那段时神经都绷得紧紧的。
因为观众预先知道那场著名的灭门惨案，所以观众会先入为主以为嬉皮士肯定是杀了房主鸠占鹊巢，以为这里肯定会有一场恶战。
结果昆汀设计成了反高潮。不但没用烂俗的套路，而且观众在高度紧张过后由衷舒一口气的心情，绝不比掏出枪哒哒哒大干一场带来的感觉差。

不存在奖文学奖获得者Olga Tokarczuk昨天在瑞典的演讲：

The general commercialization of the literary market has led to a division into branches—now there are fairs and festivals of this or that type of literature, completely separate, creating a clientele of readers eager to hole up with a crime novel, some fantasy or science fiction. A notable characteristic of this situation is that what was only supposed to help booksellers and librarians organize on their shelves the massive quantity of published books, and readers to orient themselves in the vastness of the offering, became instead abstract categories not only into which existing works are placed, but also according to which writers themselves have started writing. Increasingly, genre work is like a kind of cake mold that produces very similar results, their predictability considered a virtue, their banality an achievement. The reader knows what to expect and gets exactly what he wanted.


I have always intuitively opposed such orders, since they lead to the limiting of authorial freedom, to a reluctance toward the experimentation and transgression that is in fact the essential quality of creation in general. And they completely exclude from the creative process any of the eccentricity without which art would be lost. A good book does not need to champion its generic affiliation. The division into genres is the result of the commercialization of literature as a whole and an effect of treating it as a product for sale with the whole philosophy of branding and targeting and other, similar inventions of contemporary capitalism.