原文连接：http://www.1up.com/do/previewPage?cId=3165619
节选：

引用:

PS3 versus Xbox 360. The differences are negligible. The 360 has 'load times,' according to some, since it loads off the DVD. But these load times amount to barely noticeable 3 or 4 second loads between areas, while the PS3 version cuts the gap down to a couple seconds. The flipside is that the PS3 requires an initial install on to the harddrive. While this is only an inconvenience at the start, it may become an issue as the PS3 harddrives become smaller (new units arrive in the 40g flavors, while the 80g models are dwindling by the day) and PS3 owner's games collections become bigger. Who wants to delete and reinstall games? The graphics are virtually indistinguishable, but if it makes your life better to hear it, the PS3 doesn't do the screen 'tearing' thing the 360 occasionally does.


What the 360 doesn't do, however, is drop a wireless Bluetooth signal, which is what happens fairly consistently on PS3. There's nothing like being in the heat of battle when Nero or Dante suddenly stops doing what you want him to. Of course, if this happens once or twice a mission, that'd be the maximum, but that's more than enough for anyone. The Xbox 360 version also has the benefit of enabling force feedback from the very start, although this function will eventually work with the PS3 when the Dual Shock 3 comes here later this year. The Motion Sensor functionality is all but useless in the PS3 version, though. The game will support 720p on both PS3 and Xbox 360. Essentially, there's no reason to favor one over the other, and if you have both systems, go with whichever controller you feel more comfortable with. That's what we'd do.

看来垂直同步问题明朗化了。

既然是事实，而又有人爱听，说出来何乐而不为呢？

“如果是事实，也就无所谓爱听不爱听了”，事实的话，当然就无所谓谁爱不爱听了，但是还是有些人会受刺激。

引用:

原帖由 WhinStone 于 2008-1-28 18:36 发表

与其说刺激谁，倒不如说这是在应付谁~

随你怎么说，知道了这个事实就成了。

引用:

原帖由 WhinStone 于 2008-1-28 18:47 发表


早说阿，这论坛大家低头不见抬头见的，你若是喜欢被应付，大家随时都可以援手，何必跑去国外看E文~
甚么秒杀，血洗，海啸的，只要你爱听，以后每次回帖都给你附上两句好了~

真委屈啊，想说1UP造谣也无从开口，只能旁敲侧击地和秒杀，血洗，海啸放一起说了。

引用:

原帖由 西门啐血 于 2008-1-28 19:20 发表
PS3版有手柄掉线的问题, 想知道天X和盘X对此的看法:D

目前玩了将近10个游戏，六轴和DS3两个手柄游戏中掉线发生几率为0，不知道是不是RP。

有标配硬盘当然要发挥硬盘的优势，至于BD和DVD读盘速度，这么快就忘了火热狂飙开发者的话了？

引用:

原帖由 西门啐血 于 2008-1-28 19:41 发表


233...
火热狂飙开发者怎么说BD/DVD的? 你说来听听?

去翻老帖吧，大概意思就是BD是恒定线速度方式读取数据，DVD是恒定角速度，BD内外圈数据读取是相同的，而DVD是外圈快，内圈慢。

[ 本帖最后由 zhangjingy 于 2008-1-28 19:46 编辑 ]

PS3的2x Blu-ray Drive 恒定线速度 (72Mbps(9MB/s))，数据读取速度是 9MB/s.

XO的12x DVD-Rom Drive 恒定角速度，读取D9盘，最大8x，平均(4.36MB/s-10.57MB/s(AVG ~6x(7.93MB/s)

9-7.93=1.07，哪个平均速度快就很明显了，不过XO游戏也有少数非D9的，或者是D9盘，但是容量非常小（而且把数据推到外圈），这种情况下读取平均速度可能会高过BD。

厚道地再放出参考来源：
Hitachi 12x DVD-Rom Faq (Page 2)
http://www.hitachi.us/supporting ... d%20read%20speed%22
What is DVD?
http://www.videohelp.com/dvd
Blu-ray.com Blu-ray FAQ
http://www.blu-ray.com/faq/
Wikipedia - Constant Linear Velocity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constant_linear_velocity
Wikipedia - Constant Angular Velocity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constant_angular_velocity

[ 本帖最后由 zhangjingy 于 2008-1-28 19:53 编辑 ]

引用:

原帖由 西门啐血 于 2008-1-28 19:54 发表






那火热狂飙开发者到底有没有说哪个媒体更好?

开发者说，DVD容量是个障碍，你觉得他们认为哪个更好？

什么时候轮到没S能力（无标配硬盘）的对有S能力的（有硬盘，还可以换更大硬盘）指指点点了。

引用:

原帖由 csish 于 2008-1-28 20:18 发表

谁让console一直以免安装即开即玩为优势呢...

原来你连PS3游戏的硬盘安装都没见过啊，以为是PC安装游戏那么慢呢？

引用:

原帖由 csish 于 2008-1-28 20:25 发表

错,是比pc版安装更慢
同样容量的文件,pc上是高倍速光驱加7200转以上大硬盘,ps3上是最高9m的光驱加笔记本硬盘,谁快谁慢一目了然

这不过是没碰过PS3的人自以为是的想法罢了，LOL。笔记本硬盘，我笑。

[ 本帖最后由 zhangjingy 于 2008-1-28 20:28 编辑 ]

DMC4没拿到手，还不清楚，我玩的游戏里，上古卷轴4安装的数据最大（将近5G），玩了一段时间后，上网才知道上古卷轴4是必须硬盘安装一部分数据的，后来特意看了说明书和盘盒子后面，确实有写，可见开始玩的时候，安装这个步骤是多么的不起眼。

[ 本帖最后由 zhangjingy 于 2008-1-28 20:35 编辑 ]