引用:

原帖由 江户川柯南 于 2013-11-3 10:38 发表
这个测试是纯粹基于硬件测试还是与系统相关的。如果是与系统有关，我觉得一点都不奇怪。因为iOS系统从一开始就有自动修正你触摸点的一个设计。这个我最早用iPhone1代的时候就发现了。因为你的手指那么粗，总不可能每 ...

貌似不是
根据pdf文件 他们使用的是特定的软件，就是测准确程度的跟你用软件无关
Many users may have already found out that it is not very easy to press letters Q and P on the virtual   keyboard of an iPhone 5S or iPhone 5C. This is because the touch accuracy on the sides is not as good   as in the center of the screen.  When we look the results closely, you can see how the test results   correlate with the end user performance.

When we look at the measurement result of that area, red and green points as well as black and red
circles indicate how the device reacts robot touch. Green points indicate that measurement
inaccuracy is less than 1 ± mm. Red points indicate that measurement inaccuracy is more than 1 mm.
Black circles show the point where robot touches a sensor. Green and red points inside or outside
circles indicate also, where the device under test thinks robot is touching.  And red circles indicate
that the device has not reacted to the touch of the robot at all.

引用:

原帖由 kingcai 于 2013-11-3 11:28 发表


前面写错了，是4.8inch。我也觉得这还不算最符合，应该找找有没有屏幕大小完全一样的猴机

倒没有，人单纯选了个一年前的，但是还挺好用的GS3……