原帖由 @kouryu 于 2015-5-1 22:43 发表
装了百度一测试,电脑已经不是自己的了。
原帖由 jjx01 于 2015-5-2 11:51 发表
749518
来自AV-test的facebook:https://www.facebook.com/avtestorg/posts/952718894780899
泼脏水?只是大家都不干净吧
原帖由 kidog 于 2015-5-2 12:56 发表
都追到原文了怎么不下后面PDF自己看看?
http://www.av-test.org/fileadmin/pdf/VB-AVC-AVT-press-release.pdf
提到腾讯、百度的是下面这段,也就是腾讯声明里av-test说没证据表明标记会带来优势甚至会带来劣势那 ...
原帖由 jjx01 于 2015-5-2 18:19 发表
有证据表明除了360以外还有一家公司不干净
所以说大家都不干净,没什么问题
至于另一家是不是腾讯,目前不知道而已
但说另一家不是腾讯,证据也不足
原帖由 alann 于 2015-5-2 13:47 发表
posted by wap, platform: 华为 Ascend Mate 7
纠结是不是泼脏水有意义?难道最好不是完全不用国产?不说别的,说不定用户改个host国产安全软件就偷偷报密了
原帖由 @dhd 于 2015-5-2 10:01 发表
楼主发的是假消息
原帖由 @kidog 于 2015-5-2 12:56 发表
都追到原文了怎么不下后面PDF自己看看?
http://www.avtest.org/fileadmin/pdf/VBAVCAVTpressrelease.pdf
提到腾讯、百度的是下面这段,也就是腾讯声明里avtest说没证据表明标记会带来优势甚至会带来劣势那段原文
As part of the investigation into Qihoo 360, counter゛ccusations were levelled by the company against
two fellow Chinese security firms, Baidu and Tencent. Analysis of products submitted for testing by
these companies turned up some unexpected flags within their products, marked with the names of
several test labs and implying some difference in product behavior depending on the environment they
were run in – similar flags were also found in Qihoo products. However, no evidence could be found that
this gave any significant advantage to either product, and in some cases it even seemed to put them at a
disadvantage. Both firms were able to provide good reasons for including these flags in their products.
除此之外是说明360怎么送测开bd关avm跑分,实际应用中开avm关bd和腾讯百度没关系了,那篇拿avtest当幌子说有确凿证据表明腾讯作弊、偏差值等等影都没有,这还不是编故事泼脏水?或者avtest另有一篇pdf我没看到?
原帖由 ninggu2008 于 2015-5-3 00:29 发表
posted by wap, platform: 小米 红米
还真是有另一份pdf,官网短暂出现后撤掉
参见
http://bbs.kafan.cn/thread-1825649-1-1.html
欢迎光临 TGFC Lifestyle (http://bbs.tgfcer.com/) | Powered by Discuz! 6.0.0 |