Board logo

标题: NBA历史上有没有两个人占球队薪金75%+最后取得总冠军的球队？ [打印本页]
作者: ly781223    时间: 2007-5-16 10:11     标题: NBA历史上有没有两个人占球队薪金75%+最后取得总冠军的球队？

如题，两个超级主机占球队全部薪金的75%+，最后这个球队还取得了总冠军，历史上有没有过这种球队？
作者: Pele    时间: 2007-5-16 10:24

夺不夺冠不说，现在NBA有这样的球队？
作者: ly781223    时间: 2007-5-16 10:29

假设加内特去了湖人，那就有了
作者: Pele    时间: 2007-5-16 10:43

引用:
原帖由 ly781223 于 2007-5-16 10:29 发表
假设加内特去了湖人，那就有了
那也到不了.....
工资帽的75可能勉强能到
LAL的工资总额超工资帽不少
作者: hugang    时间: 2007-5-16 10:45

KG去了湖人，科比的工资要降了吧。。。:D
作者: ly781223    时间: 2007-5-16 10:49

引用:
原帖由 Pele 于 2007-5-16 10:43 发表

那也到不了.....
工资帽的75可能勉强能到
LAL的工资总额超工资帽不少
说的就是工资帽啊
总额当然不可能到
作者: 戆比样的勇士    时间: 2007-5-16 10:49

all start

除了这个好象没有。更别说冠军了。



天朝你颤抖么!?
作者: Pele    时间: 2007-5-16 10:53

引用:
原帖由 ly781223 于 2007-5-16 10:49 发表

说的就是工资帽啊
总额当然不可能到
工资帽容易呀
98年工资帽3000万
乔老爷一个人拿3300万的工资，还不是一样拿戒指
作者: ly781223    时间: 2007-5-16 10:55

引用:
原帖由 Pele 于 2007-5-16 10:53 发表

工资帽容易呀
98年工资帽3000万
乔老爷一个人拿3300万的工资，还不是一样拿戒指
工资帽不是按照球队收入百分比来制定的吗？
作者: ly781223    时间: 2007-5-16 10:55

引用:
原帖由 Pele 于 2007-5-16 10:53 发表

工资帽容易呀
98年工资帽3000万
乔老爷一个人拿3300万的工资，还不是一样拿戒指
工资帽不是按照球队收入百分比来制定的吗？
作者: sectionboy    时间: 2007-5-16 10:58

是按照联盟收入百分比的吧？
作者: ly781223    时间: 2007-5-16 11:01

联盟吗？
我一直以为是球队呢
作者: LostEve    时间: 2007-5-16 11:01

玩统计学呢？:D
作者: rjx0905    时间: 2007-5-16 11:49

引用:
原帖由 LostEve 于 2007-5-16 11:01 发表
玩统计学呢？:D
恩！工资帽是以球员收入平摊到联盟收入里面的一种计算方式!每年都不一样的
作者: sectionboy    时间: 2007-5-16 11:53

How is the salary cap set each year?

Each July the league projects Basketball Related Income (BRI) and benefits for the upcoming season.  They take a defined percentage of projected BRI (see the chart below), subtract projected benefits (about $112 million in 2005-06), and make adjustments based on whether the previous season's BRI was above or below projections.  They then divide by the number of NBA teams (except expansion teams in their first two seasons) to arrive at the cap.  The salary cap adjusts each year on the first day following the July Moratorium (see question number 89).

Note that adjusting based on whether the previous season's BRI was above or below projections creates a pattern where the salary cap increases significantly one year, and barely moves (or even decreases) the next.  This effect was more pronounced in the previous CBA, where lump-sum payments for such things as local media contracts counted fully in the year in which they were received.  The current CBA addressed this problem by mandating that lump-sum payments will be applied evenly across all of the salary cap years covered by a contract.  However, adjustments from the previous CBA (such as a $74 million increase in BRI in 04-05 attributable to the Lakers' local cable revenue) created a rebound effect that will last well into the current CBA.
SeasonDefined percentage of BRI
Actual salary cap
2005-0649.5%*
$49.5 million ($37.125 million for the Charlotte Bobcats)
2006-07
51%
$53.135 million
2007-0851%
2008-0951%
2009-1051%
2010-11
51%
2011-12
51%

* The league and Players Association agreed to use a figure of $49.5 million for the 2005-06 cap, rather than the calculated figure (which would have resulted in a salary cap of $50.9 million).

At the other end of the spectrum there is a minimum team salary, which is defined as 75% of the salary cap.  Any team that doesn't spend at least that much is surcharged at the end of the season, and that money is given to the players.  In practice, most teams' salaries will be higher than the salary cap amount.
作者: sectionboy    时间: 2007-5-16 11:56

引用:
原帖由 ly781223 于 2007-5-16 11:01 发表
联盟吗？
我一直以为是球队呢
NBA的一个制度优点就是很多事情都由联盟决定，很大程度上避免了一家独大的豪门出现。
作者: colybobo    时间: 2007-5-16 17:15

但是足球也是这样的话就玩不转了
作者: van601030    时间: 2007-5-16 21:59

还有人会去统计这个/??



欢迎光临 TGFC Lifestyle (http://bbs.tgfcer.com/) Powered by Discuz! 6.0.0