这个价格不算贵吧，是LED光源1080P的，LG之前有款定焦的PF80，也要8K多

posted by wap, platform: Samsung
刚在优酷上看了一个外国人的高清评测，虽然听不懂再说什么，看起来效果还可以啊。

posted by wap, platform: Samsung
淘宝看了下，有代购9888一台。

posted by wap, platform: Galaxy Note III

引用:

原帖由 @威猛先生  于 2015-10-26 20:42 发表
9k有点贵吧，不知道实际效果和笨球1080比起来如何

只是稍微贵了一点，相对于它的前一代led微投来说。所以还可以啦

posted by wap, platform: Galaxy Note III

引用:

原帖由 @威猛先生  于 2015-10-26 21:18 发表
刚在优酷上看了一个外国人的高清评测，虽然听不懂再说什么，看起来效果还可以啊。

伸手党求链接

posted by wap, platform: Galaxy Note III
我现在比较关心色轮。要是和前一代是三色led没有色轮问题就好了。我轻微彩虹眼

posted by wap, platform: Samsung

引用:

原帖由 @lvcha  于 2015-10-26 21:30 发表
伸手党求链接

http://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XMTM1MzA0MjM5Ng==.html?from=s7.8-1.2&x

posted by wap, platform: Android
这是led投影，应该不用色轮的

posted by wap, platform: Firefox
http://www.avsforum.com/forum/68-digital-projectors-under-3-000-usd-msrp/2133386-ifa-2015-lg-pf1000u-ultra-short-throw-projector-7.html

里面有跟前代的对比可惜你的管子看不到

posted by wap, platform: Galaxy Note III
貌似是新的0.47 dmd，不是菱形排列

posted by wap, platform: Firefox
I've had the PF1000u for about a week now. It's definitely a "cool" little projector but ultimately it's not cutting it for me and I am sending it back. I don't have the technical background that a lot of folks do here, but here's why I'm returning...

1) Contrast ratio. Just isn't good enough. I knew the 150,000:1 spec was purely marketing and it definitely is. My "main" projector - Sony 95ES is also rated at 150,000:1 and there is a clear difference between the two. And for the past several months I've been watching TV on an LG OLED which has completely spoiled me when it comes to contrast.

2) Image is soft. Again, and I know it's not fair to compare with my Sony projector, but the difference in image clarity/sharpness is easily noticeable.

3) Rainbow effect. I've read some people saying they haven't seen any or very little. I see it almost any time white is being displayed and it's distracting to me.

I could have lived with 1 or maybe 2 of these issues but with all 3 I just can't justify keeping it.

Positively - 3D does look great and with glasses on it does mitigate the contrast issue to some extent, but I don't watch enough 3D to warrant keeping for this alone.

I'd reiterate what others have said that if space absolutely requires a very short throw, then maybe all of these issues could be ignored. But honestly I'd rather have a better image at 55-65" than what this can produce at a larger screen size. Very hopeful that the next generation model will be a step up.

还是差点意思貌似。

posted by wap, platform: Chrome
0.47DMD就算了。