posted by wap, platform: Chrome
虽然是下载挂机党  但是现在44.1听着都是毛刺 且高频严重不给力
另外做了一份邓丽君的48000采样的FLAC 试试手机

参数《ffmpeg -i "F:\环球SACD天碟 邓丽君极品之选\环球SACD天碟-邓丽君极品之选-CD02 [1].wav" -ar 48000 -sample_fmt s32 -acodec flac "F:\环球SACD天碟 邓丽君极品之选\2.flac"》

在盖世兔里边 用POWERAMP播的很给力 比CD转的FLAC爽很多  高音清澈稳定  我这耳机可能是水果四原装单元 不贵 但是高频不错
谁要的给传网盘咯

另外果然IOS的输出是44.1k的  48K的东西怎么都模糊不堪

posted by wap, platform: GOOGLE Nexus 5

引用:

原帖由 @yangjuniori  于 2015-3-2 00:01 发表
虽然是下载挂机党  但是现在44.1听着都是毛刺 且高频严重不给力
另外做了一份邓丽君的48000采样的FLAC 试试手机

参数《ffmpeg i "F:环球SACD天碟 邓丽君极品之选环球SACD天碟邓丽君极品之选CD02 .wav" ar 48000 sample_fmt s32 acodec flac "F:环球SACD天碟 邓丽君极品之选2.flac"》

在盖世兔里边 用POWERAMP播的很给力 比CD转的FLAC爽很多  高音清澈稳定  我这耳机可能是水果四原装单元 不贵 但是高频不错
谁要的给传网盘咯

另外果然IOS的输出是44.1k的  48K的东西怎么都模糊不堪

这sacd转成wav就不会失真吗？sacd不是1bit矢量载波么？你那wav是什么采样的

十年前听DVD-A，觉得确实好点，但我觉得那大体是由多声道带来的效果提升，所谓的24bit-96KHz作用对我的耳朵而言提升极其有限。
现在LZ听CD都能听出全是毛刺，如果盘本身没问题，那只能说LZ的耳朵确实不一般。
个人的观点是，流行音乐，CD那是完全够了。需要高解析度的，是那些古典音乐，尤其是管弦乐队的。但是一个核心的矛盾就是，古典乐是听版本的，也就是版本的重要性大于所谓的数据规格重要性，举个极端例子就是阿巴多指挥维也纳爱乐的版本，即使盘片都爆音了，也要远比那什么周周指挥某个乐团的SACD版本要好不知哪里去了。而且由于录音技术与年代问题，一些大师的版本，母片就已经有了相当的问题，那么再怎么提升规格数字化，也已经没什么用了。

posted by wap, platform: iPhone
你如果用Mac听音乐，我推荐买个Auidrvana Plus这个软件，普通CD可以升到192khz采样率，声音有质的提升。我的DAC最大只能到192，如果DAC支持更高还可以到更高。而且用这个软件AirPlay到音箱上的效果也很好。AirPlay到箱子上听最熟悉的Decca老克莱伯指挥维爱1955年版《费加罗的婚礼》，虽然AirPlay因为Apple的限制无法突破44.1kHz的采样频率，但是比之前在这个箱子上无论是PC还是Mac上的iTunes播放Apple Lossless文件都要好很多。这个录音还是单声道录音，虽然decca修复得非常好。

posted by wap, platform: iPhone

引用:

原帖由 @hourousha  于 2015-3-1 08:28 AM 发表
十年前听DVDA，觉得确实好点，但我觉得那大体是由多声道带来的效果提升，所谓的24bit96KHz作用对我的耳朵而言提升极其有限。
现在LZ听CD都能听出全是毛刺，如果盘本身没问题，那只能说LZ的耳朵确实不一般。
个人的观点是，流行音乐，CD那是完全够了。需要高解析度的，是那些古典音乐，尤其是管弦乐队的。但是一个核心的矛盾就是，古典乐是听版本的，也就是版本的重要性大于所谓的数据规格重要性，举个极端例子就是阿巴多指挥维也纳爱乐的版本，即使盘片都爆音了，也要远比那什么周周指挥某个乐团的SACD版本要好不知哪里去了。而且由于录音技术与年代问题，一些大师的版本，母片就已经有了相当的问题，那么再怎么提升规格数字化，也已经没什么用了。

是的。富特文格勒在拜罗伊特音乐节的贝九虽然录音不堪，但是在我心目中没有版本比这个好听，虽然后期版本乐器可以更辉煌灿烂让目眩神怡。究其原因就是“演绎”大于“录音”，而“演绎”是更接近于“现场”的属性，也就是古典音乐还是“现场聆听”是第一位的。这个三月要听两场，杜达梅尔指挥洛杉矶爱乐演奏马勒六和德沃夏克九，每次去我都像要朝圣一般，之前大量熟悉作品然后“盛装出席”，对于我来说去听现场是一种“神圣的仪式”，因为虽然我的票位置不是最好的，但是我认为我听到的声音无论是音色还是位置都是比“录音”准确的。

引用:

原帖由 grammyliu 于 2015-3-2 00:37 发表
posted by wap, platform: iPhone
你如果用Mac听音乐，我推荐买个Auidrvana Plus这个软件，普通CD可以升到192khz采样率，声音有质的提升。我的DAC最大只能到192，如果DAC支持更高还可以到更高。而且用这个软件AirPla ...

纯粹提升采样率没有效果这是常识，你听着有区别唯一的可能就是动了EQ

posted by wap, platform: iPhone

引用:

原帖由 @benbensoldier  于 2015-3-1 08:48 AM 发表
纯粹提升采样率没有效果这是常识，你听着有区别唯一的可能就是动了EQ

Sound quality

But what about sound quality? In that area there’s something strange going on. I decided to try out Audirvana Plus 2 with three different DACs: an Apogee Duet iPad & Mac, an AudioEngine D1 and an Audioquest Dragonfly 2.0. I tested with classical music only — that’s the only music I really listen to anyway. I ran the same tests with Amarra 3 again.

Now, here’s what strange: with Amarra 3, the three DACs sounded pretty much the same. There were very subtle differences between the Duet, the D1 and the Dragonfly. If I would have someone else change the cables and connections and listen to the music with my eyes closed, I wouldn’t have been able to tell the difference.

When I tried the three DACs with Audirvana Plus 2, I suddenly heard very clear differences. The D1 was more clear — almost harsh — sounding than the Duet, with the Dragonfly in-between. The Duet performed better in the bass tones, etc. There was a better sound-stage with the Duet than with the D1, etc, etc.

Playing Queue



To make sure I wasn’t making this up, I switched back to Amarra 3, but I got the same result: an almost identical sound from the three DACs — less transparency and less sound staging as well. It all sounded a little bit muddier.

I can only find one explanation for this: in Amarra 3, some equalisation is going on, despite me having turned off their EQ feature explicitly. I know SonicStudio is raving about their EQ capabilities, and there are specific headphone EQ settings in the built-in EQ feature. But I would expect the EQ feature to be off when I teel it to. I now suspect it somehow isn’t.

In contrast, Audirvana Plus 2.0.1 seems not to add anything to your music — just the sound as it was recorded. In the past, when I still listened to a Denon Super Audio CD player with a Musical Fidelity headphones amplifier connected, I could hear whether a recording was good or bad. From those years, I still remember which CDs sound like rubbish and which are brilliant.

With Audirvana Plus 2.0.1 I got back that experience and that’s what I expect from a HiFi music player. In Audirvana Plus’ Preferences I can select an Audio Filter if I want that. I have NUGENAudio SEQ-S eqaliser on my system, an EQ that is vastly superior to the Amarra 3 one. I have yet to turn it on, so I don’t know yet if I want that — but the point is that in Audirvana Plus 2 I will at least have a choice. In Amarra 3 I should have that choice too, but it seems like it doesn’t matter much.

As I was surprised by the Amarra sound experience, I tried activating the EQ and setting it at extreme levels. The sound changed, but not by much — and it only became muddier. Perhaps my system is to blame, a conflict with the many pro audio recording apps I keep on the system from previous reviews. Even if that is the case, it doesn’t affect Audirvana Plus 2.

Bottom-line as experienced from my testing: Audirvana Plus 2.0.1 doesn’t just look better and has at least as good management functionality as iTunes, it also sounds like it’s supposed to: with High Fidelity.

posted by wap, platform: Chrome
交响很容易被他的声场忽悠了 声场最不需要高频了 反而流行很需要高频

posted by wap, platform: Meizu 魅蓝
耳朵又进化了吗

posted by wap, platform: LG
水果的塞子楼主就可以听出不同，这让我用hd700情以何堪，楼主真金耳朵也！

posted by wap, platform: OPPO FIND 7 标准版
44.1k全是毛刺。。蛰蜇，这耳朵。可以

posted by wap, platform: OPPO FIND 7 标准版
44.1k全是毛刺。。蛰蜇，这耳朵。可以

posted by wap, platform: OPPO FIND 7 标准版
另外，凡是重新采样皆是劣化音质

posted by wap, platform: Chrome

引用:

原帖由 @爱游戏  于 2015-3-2 09:15 AM 发表
另外，凡是重新采样皆是劣化音质

晚上无声环境听的
安卓既然48K就要找更高的转换成48来保存 显然CDDA是不行的

posted by wap, platform: Chrome
WAV-192KHZ-64bit(precise)
怎么网盘上有好多这样命名的 感觉很有问题