On the CPU side for Android we’re still limited to just a few tests that rely on a combination of native code and stuff that runs inside the browser. That means AndEBench, JavaScript benchmarks, and part of Vellamo.

Sunspider has been a regular staple but in recent time has become an exercise in browser JavaScript engine optimization rather than actual performance. Nevertheless the FFRD takes the crown in both 1.0 and 0.9.1 (we have more tablet data from the 0.9.1 version so I replicated it here).

Kraken is another JavaScript benchmark which hasn’t quite been an optimization target everyone has gone after lately, and it’s also longer, which makes it a bit more reliable. Once again Bay Trail takes the crown here with notably faster JS engine performance.

Google Octane is another JS test that isn’t quite as platform optimized yet, here there’s once again dominance by Bay Trail with just over a 50 percent higher score.

Browsermark has a combination of both JS tests and other web related performance metrics. Here the Bay Trail platform lags behind the 8974 based devices slightly. This isn’t a raw JavaScript benchmark again but rather a more holistic web browsing performance test, so it’s interesting to see Bay Trail a bit behind here.

AndEBench is a combination native compiled microkernel benchmark (indicative of NDK application performance) that also runs a very similar workload atop Dalvik like a normal Android Java application. Here we can see what Intel was talking about when they said they have more work to do getting Dalvik working properly at dispatching threads to appropriate cores, hopefully the Java number will climb considerably. The native test also shows a lead over the competition.
GPU PerformanceWhile Bay Trail clearly leads on the CPU side, its GPU performance is more middle of the road - at least among the higher end SoCs. In 3DMark Bay Trail's GPU performance is aided by the more CPU bound nature of the benchmark, but here Intel is able to beat the Snapdragon 600. Snapdragon 800 on the other hand pulls ahead by around 35%.

The 3DMark Physics test is effectively a CPU test, which once again plays to Bay Trail's strengths. Here it's faster than Snapdragon 800 and Cortex A15. Only Ivy Bridge is quicker in a tablet.

Basemark XBasemark X is a bit more GPU bound than 3DMark, and we also have iOS data here so we can put Bay Trail's performance in better perspective. Here Bay Trail is a bit slower than the iPad 4, and clearly Tegra 4 and Snapdragon 800. Intel's GPU in Android is measurably quicker than Adreno 320/S600 though.
Bay Trail's onscreen performance is penalized by the FFRD's extremely high native resolution.

GLBenchmark 2.7The more interested GLBenchmark numbers, T-Rex HD, show Bay Trail just behind the iPad 4 in performance. It's definitely not bad at all but clearly not industry leading.

posted by wap, platform: Android

功耗多少？

什么时候能买到baytrail+win8.1，400刀（最高不超过500刀），8寸左右，续航7-8小时，带4G的平板，什么时候巨硬和outel就赢了

引用:

原帖由 ｊｉａ 于 2013-9-12 10:15 发表
posted by wap, platform: Android

功耗多少？

高负载下cpu 1-2.5w

引用:

原帖由 catxing 于 2013-9-12 10:16 发表
什么时候能买到baytrail+win8.1，400刀（最高不超过500刀），8寸左右，续航7-8小时，带4G的平板，什么时候巨硬和outel就赢了

到明年这个时候你这价都买不到，x86+win的平板价格不会便宜。

引用:

原帖由 catxing 于 2013-9-12 10:16 发表
什么时候能买到baytrail+win8.1，400刀（最高不超过500刀），8寸左右，续航7-8小时，带4G的平板，什么时候巨硬和outel就赢了

东芝的8寸只要300多刀 当然这个价位的是不带4G的
http://www.imp3.net/10/show.php?itemid=41591

引用:

原帖由 catxing 于 2013-9-12 10:16 发表
什么时候能买到baytrail+win8.1，400刀（最高不超过500刀），8寸左右，续航7-8小时，带4G的平板，什么时候巨硬和outel就赢了

华硕CEO沈振来亲临旧金山IDF，拿出了新款平板“Transformer Book T100”，配备一颗Atom Z3740。

这是款10.1寸的平板机，IPS屏幕，分辨率1366×768，2GB LPDDR3内存，32/64GB eMMC闪存存储，支持microSD卡扩展，micro USB、micro HDMI接口，Windows 8.1操作系统并预装Office 2013。

它也提供了一个键盘底座，可额外增加一个USB 3.0接口。华硕称，他们的键盘设计要挑战ThinkPad、MacBook。

不含底座尺寸10.4×6.7×0.41英寸(264.2×170.2×10.4毫米)，重量约550克，加上底座厚度0.93英寸(23.6毫米)、1100克。

电池容量31Wh，官方称可续航最长11个小时。

价格？确实不便宜，32GB 349美元，10月18日上市。

国内买的话，加17%，要410刀了，但10.1的设备能做到550克，真是超出预期了。

posted by wap, platform: Chrome

拖后腿的是win8...

这种傻逼分辨率的平板还好意思拿出来卖？

Baytrail和atom，这种级别的U说实在卖的和haswell一个价格我觉得不合理。。。

引用:

原帖由 EpilogueSKM 于 2013-9-12 10:41 发表
这种傻逼分辨率的平板还好意思拿出来卖？

10寸1200P+win你想看瞎眼？

为啥会看瞎眼？你当还是xp？

还是那句话最低1080P，低于这个分辨率的平板全部丢进垃圾桶，没啥好说的

引用:

原帖由 EpilogueSKM 于 2013-9-12 10:41 发表
这种傻逼分辨率的平板还好意思拿出来卖？

这让11.3的air情何以堪。

引用:

原帖由 EpilogueSKM 于 2013-9-12 10:47 发表
为啥会看瞎眼？你当还是xp？

还是那句话最低1080P，低于这个分辨率的平板全部丢进垃圾桶，没啥好说的

win系桌面应用对高DPI基本没有优化，那么小的字不瞎眼？

什么？你不用桌面应用？那你买X86平板跟傻逼没两样