显然抽了

确实抽了，不过苹果说是RETINA就是的吧，反正这个也是苹果说得算

http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1201780

There is no 300dpi limit for a "Retina" display
I know this has been said, but it bears repeating.

I've been seeing a ton of posts about the so-called 300dpi limit for a display to be retina. Many of these have been recently with talk of a larger screen iPhone. Well, hate to disappoint, but theres no such thing as a 300dpi limit for retina. It doesnt, and never did, exist.

In the iPhone 4 keynote last year, which you can go watch right now, Steve said that if you hold a device the size of the iPhone AT 12 INCHES from your face, the eye will not distinguish pixels past 300DPI. This is a 3.5' display held 12 inches from your face (And even that claim was challenged)

The calculation for "Retina" depens on pixel density, screen size, and distance from face.

If the iPhone 5 has a 4" display, it'll be assumed that you'll hold it 14-16" from your face, thus the DPI count can be lower (270-280) and still be Retina.

Hope that helps.

这时候猴板支持者也就能找找这种无关痛痒的文字游戏聊表自慰了

4倍分辨率，电池依旧，机能使用速度正常提升，4g网络，没涨价。猴板还玩啥啊，现在都没有能跟ipad2相提并论的，下个礼拜就要被甩开2年了

转移话题不错

继续讨论教主这张图吧

posted by wap, platform: iPhone

who care？

引用:

原帖由 burnfox 于 2012-3-8 03:01 发表
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1201780

There is no 300dpi limit for a "Retina" display
I know this has been said, but it bears repeating.

I've been seeing a ton of posts about the ...

233 非官方网站也能取代教主对Retina的定义？

posted by wap, platform: iPhone

有4的感官效果就行，管它retina还是复眼还是鹰眼

反正苹果说了算，谁让人家老大呢

posted by wap, platform: SAMSUNG (Nexus S)

这不是讨论过了吗？比iphone拿的远，仍然是视网膜屏。这个视网膜屏又没有硬指标，所以家里的显示器大电视都是视网膜屏

iPhone 4的发布会也并未指出300是所有尺寸屏幕的标准。

显然苹果取了其狭义指代，特定当时的场合。

引用:

原帖由 burnfox 于 2012-3-8 03:12 发表
iPhone 4的发布会也并未指出300是所有尺寸屏幕的标准。

显然苹果取了其狭义指代，特定当时的场合。

连烧狐狸也要对教主鞭尸了

别替别人说话好么

人家说了，ip4是离眼睛10cm，ipad是离眼睛15cm