全文：http://www.anandtech.com/show/53 ... ive-for-smartphones
intel工艺真心牛逼 能把集成了一颗X86CPU的SOC核心面积压缩到62mm^2 就比以小核心著称的黄老板2稍微大一点 比A5 猎户座 黄老板3都小不少
架构图：

CPU成绩


GPU成绩 毕竟集成的是400MHz的PVR540 所以成绩一般 年底会推出集成543MP2的型号

功耗：

来吧来吧........intel还是有一定可信度的.

32nm不比45/40nm小就奇怪了

集成的540，如果还那么大，对得起工艺第一这个名号么？

Intel所到之处无一幸免

很强啊·····GS2 IP4S都干翻了

我艹，这功耗，这性能，这芯片尺寸碉堡了啊！

黄老板要着急了！

剩下的就看X86架构对ARM架构软件的兼容性了，如果pass，那妥妥的神器

引用:

原帖由 jun4rui 于 2012-1-11 17:39 发表
我艹，这功耗，这性能，这芯片尺寸碉堡了啊！

黄老板要着急了！

剩下的就看X86架构对ARM架构软件的兼容性了，如果pass，那妥妥的神器

顶楼的评测里面的
ARM Compatibility: Binary Translation

Similar to Apple's move from PowerPC to x86, Intel finds itself in a difficult position with bringing Atom to Android. The OS isn't an issue as it has already been ported to x86 and all further releases will be available in both ARM and x86 flavors. The bigger problem is application compatibility.

There's already support for targeting both ARM and x86 architectures in the Android NDK so anything developed going forward should be ok so long as the developer is aware of x86.

Obviously the first party apps already work on x86, but what about those in the Market?

By default all Android apps run in a VM and are thus processor architecture agnostic. As long as the apps are calling Android libraries that aren't native ARM there, once again, shouldn't be a problem. Where Intel will have a problem is with apps that do call native libraries or apps that are ARM native (e.g. virtually anything CPU intensive like a 3D game).

Intel believes that roughly 75% of all Android apps in the Market don't feature any native ARM code. The remaining 25% are the issue. The presumption is that eventually this will be a non-issue (described above), but what do users of the first x86 Android phones do? Two words: binary translation.

Intel isn't disclosing much about the solution, but by intercepting ARM binaries and translating ARM code to x86 code on the fly during execution Intel is hoping to achieve ~90% app compatibility at launch. Binary translation is typically noticeably slower than running native code, although Intel is unsurprisingly optimistic about the experience on Android. I'm still very skeptical about the overall experience but we'll have to wait and see for ourselves.

我反正是信Intel神教的

其实我觉得intel最大的问题是定价 intel为了维持一个比较高的毛利水准 定价一般的比较高 比如超级本上的低电压系列CPU 一直都不肯降低厂商的进货价 不知道现在为了能在移动平台上发力能不能把芯片的的价格压下来

同楼上，我也是intel教的，一般不出手，出手就是必杀

除了atom, 我也信intel教的

引用:

原帖由 popboy139 于 2012-1-11 18:00 发表
其实我觉得intel最大的问题是定价 intel为了维持一个比较高的毛利水准 定价一般的比较高 比如超级本上的低电压系列CPU 一直都不肯降低厂商的进货价 不知道现在为了能在移动平台上发力能不能把芯片的的价格压下来

现在intel在移动领域是追赶者

intel需要高毛利率来维持其工艺独步天下的局势
手机soc不适合此领域

引用:

原帖由 tdka 于 2012-1-11 18:03 发表

现在intel在移动领域是追赶者

移动领域的生态系统只是像新西兰这样的小岛，生活着一些渡渡鸟一样的毫无竞争力的物种，一旦旧大陆的先进生物如 鼠 猫 狗 猪入侵之后，立马就要灭绝了。硬威大打头阵，Intel随后杀入，那是一片腥风血雨啊。