双倍晶体管，双倍核心，一半性能

明明是三分之二性能好伐，楼主A黑

看我的图

[ 本帖最后由 hudihutian 于 2011-10-13 14:30 编辑 ]

posted by wap

农企珍妮嘛不争气啊

Learn more about FX-8150

Model
Brand
AMD
Series
FX-Series
Model
FD8150FRGUBOX
CPU Socket Type
CPU Socket Type
Socket AM3+
Tech Spec
Core
Zambezi
Multi-Core
Eight-Core
Name
FX-8150
Operating Frequency
3.6GHz
L2 Cache
8MB
L3 Cache
8MB
Manufacturing Tech
32 nm
64 bit Support
Yes
Hyper-Transport Support
Yes
Virtualization Technology Support
Yes
Thermal Design Power
125W
Cooling Device
Heatsink and Fan included



满载功耗233W的CPU，配个TDP125w的风冷散热器

zt：順便透露一下4.6G 八核心全速燒機時的耗電好了...約300瓦上下
如果CPU 體質略差點的(我之前另一顆8150P) 4.8G跑CINEBENCH R11.5要到1.5V
耗電也曾看過312瓦...


单单一颗CPU，4.8G而已，312瓦……

这种货色好意思发售伐？
深秋发售，送水冷，多有深意啊

[ 本帖最后由 ff42 于 2011-10-13 15:10 编辑 ]

这跑个pi咋还要20多秒，我记得6年以前的A64超一超就是20多秒

引用:

原帖由 arex 于 2011-10-13 15:05 发表
这跑个pi咋还要20多秒，我记得6年以前的A64超一超就是20多秒

所以AMD说领先6年是没错的














领先自己6年……

Civilization VCiv V's lateGameView benchmark presents us with two separate scores: average frame rate for the entire test as well as a no-render score that only looks at CPU performance.

While we're GPU bound in the full render score, AMD's platform appears to have a bit of an advantage here. We've seen this in the past where one platform will hold an advantage over another in a GPU bound scenario and it's always tough to explain. Within each family however there is no advantage to a faster CPU, everything is just GPU bound.

Looking at the no render score, the CPU standings are pretty much as we'd expect. The FX-8150 is thankfully a bit faster than its predecessors, but it still falls behind Sandy Bridge.
Crysis: Warhead

In CPU bound environments in Crysis Warhead, the FX-8150 is actually slower than the old Phenom II. Sandy Bridge continues to be far ahead.
Dawn of War II

We see similar results under Dawn of War II. Lightly threaded performance is simply not a strength of AMD's FX series, and as a result even the old Phenom II X6 pulls ahead.
DiRT 3We ran two DiRT 3 benchmarks to get an idea for CPU bound and GPU bound performance. First the CPU bound settings:

The FX-8150 doesn't do so well here, again falling behind the Phenom IIs. Under more real world GPU bound settings however, Bulldozer looks just fine:

Dragon Age

Dragon Age is another CPU bound title, here the FX-8150 falls behind once again.
Metro 2033Metro 2033 is pretty rough even at lower resolutions, but with more of a GPU bottleneck the FX-8150 equals the performance of the 2500K:

引用:

原帖由 hudihutian 于 2011-10-13 03:07 PM 发表


所以AMD说领先6年是没错的
领先自己6年……

大家都有吹牛的时候，看这个
Intel：2007年CPU突破20G!
http://news.mydrivers.com/1/0/102.htm

另外这个频率300w功耗我觉得着实正常，amd落后intel的工艺至少快要2代了，上一代的I7 870我测试跑4G的时候，待机功耗从60w直升300w（本人亲测），热到不行，所以按照这个对比，着实正常。
唯一的欣慰就是待机总算控制得还行了。
这cpu市场越来越不好玩了，amd太弱，intel过强，一点都没啥兴奋点了，哎

对不起，人家那不是待机功耗，是单纯的CPU功率

况且i7 870的功耗带来的是效能，推土机的功耗带来的是笑柄

这样下去intel不是想卖多少钱就卖多少钱了

引用:

原帖由 hudihutian 于 2011-10-13 04:17 PM 发表
对不起，人家那不是待机功耗，是单纯的CPU功率

况且i7 870的功耗带来的是效能，推土机的功耗带来的是笑柄

频率过高的时候会产生大量的漏电现象导致性能上升和功耗上升不成正比
不多说了，你自己用过i7 870实际测试过就知道了。推土机我会入一个，但是要看价格，太贵的话考虑买普通四核的。
这cpu市场实在太无聊了，去年到今年显卡市场也是无聊得很。

引用:

原帖由 dizhang 于 2011-10-13 16:54 发表

频率过高的时候会产生大量的漏电现象导致性能上升和功耗上升不成正比
不多说了，你自己用过i7 870实际测试过就知道了。推土机我会入一个，但是要看价格，太贵的话考虑买普通四核的。
这cpu市场实在太无聊了，去年 ...

推土机很便宜， 8150的比2500k贵几十刀，4核100出头。问题是个人用户买这个2b晶体管的废物干嘛呢

[ 本帖最后由 chovosky 于 2011-10-13 17:35 编辑 ]

我怎么看好多评测网站玩命夸推土机啊。。动不动就什么翻身力作救市神器