http://www.lensoftruth.com/?p=27725

Performance: Although this is a performance analysis, we would like to express that the graphics in Crysis 2 and Killzone 3 appear bars above the competition. First off, it’s clear that Killzone 3 graphics engine has received some major tweaking from it’s predecessor. Considering how bad ass Killzone 2 looked we expected Killzone 3 to look slightly better, but that’s simply not the case. The amount of Deferred lighting,particles and post-processing effects occurring the entire time you’re playing are absolutely mind blowing. Killzone 3 has set the graphical bar once more, and the attention to detail is on a level of its own. Let it be known, Killzone 3 has dethroned Killzone 2 as the best looking First Person Shooter plain and simple. On the other hand, Crysis 2 by no means is not a graphical slouch and Honestly, Killzone 3’s graphics can’t be matched by any other games far. So, the only question that remains, with Killzone 3 being  a graphical powerhouse  that it is, “what type of performance levels should we expect”? Well, we have the answers you’re looking for.

First up, its Crysis 2, as we observed in our analysis video, Crysis 2 runs almost perfectly by sporting a very stable 30 FPS most of the time. We noticed slight performance dips while engaged in some chaotic fire fights, but the frame rate never fell low enough to ever notice.

However, what we did notice was Crysis 2 had some screen tearing occurring throughout the upper part of the screen. As observed in our analysis video below, Crysis 2 screen tearing was very minor and occurred mostly in the upper top section of the screen and most likely won’t be noticed while playing. But the fact still remains, that Crysis 2 has screen tearing. Below are the average framerate and screen tearing percentages our analyzer captured.

Performance Continued: As seen in the graph above, Killzone 3 has absolutly zero screen tearing to record. Furthermore, Killzone 3’s frame rate was locked at 30 FPS even in the most intense battles. If we went ahead and reviewed Killzone 3’s performance and graphics department, the way it stands, we would most certainly give it 10’s across the board. Point being, Killzone 3’s performance levels were absolutely perfect, while Crysis 2’s performance levels were almost perfect. Again, we’re analyzing old code so anything could happen and that means for the better, or for the worse. Right now the future for both games is looking bright.


Killzone 3 Beta Frame Analysis:
Global percent of torn frames: 0.00
Global average FPS: 30.00
Crysis 2 Demo Frame Analysis:

Global percent of torn frames: 0.17
Global average FPS: 29.81


在kz3中大量Deferred lighting，粒子，后处理等特效贯穿始终，这拉开了差距。kz3轻松登上FPS画面王座，C2以及任何其他游戏无法企及（原文，非我YY别喷我）:D

并且kz3全程锁定30FPS，无任何撕裂现象出现。C2平均29.81FPS，同时会出现撕裂，（估计没垂直）

再加上前面分析kz3真720p，MLAA。C2非真720p,selective AA（怪不得狗牙满天）

这回kz3各方面是彻底秒杀

不过RF别急，LOT放话了，等C2的ps3版出来，他们会第一时间和xo版一起数毛:D

可是我问什么看图片比较 KZ明显都是模糊的呢

模糊？真720P比伪720P模糊，也只有某可怜群体的写轮眼神功才能发现吧，哈哈哈

如果C2的跨平台对比XO赢了，但C2对比KZ3又输了。。。
那KZ3要是移植XO，恐怕也轮不到你PS3在这显摆画面啦。

[ 本帖最后由 wyp 于 2011-2-7 14:27 编辑 ]

posted by wap, platform: Nokia (N78)

数毛网站只信Eurogamer的路过

换个更好的题材搞定COD再说吧

哭妹2只要多人地圖超過8張,單人時間超過4.5小時就已經贏了
哦或者說,M網評分超過86

按LS的理解，那么KZ3只要多人支持超过12个人对战就已经赢了
哦或者说，比不过画面咱比评分，比不过评分就比销量，比不过销量就比画面，哈哈哈。

引用:

原帖由 zhangjingy 于 2011-2-7 18:21 发表
哦或者说，比不过画面咱比评分，比不过评分就比销量，比不过销量就比画面，哈哈哈。

媽的天師轉性了嗎,居然有這種自知之明
不過你一說我才記起KZ3多人上限也從32退到24了

[ 本帖最后由 你老闆 于 2011-2-7 18:33 编辑 ]

引用:

原帖由 你老闆 于 2011-2-7 18:31 发表

媽的天師轉性了嗎,居然有這種自知之明
不過你一說我才記起KZ3多人上限也從32退到24了

非也，是某可怜群体没有自知之明，我给点破罢了，这是一语中的。
再退也比10人对战强啊，哦不不，是12人对战，哈哈哈。

[ 本帖最后由 zhangjingy 于 2011-2-7 19:02 编辑 ]

16:26:56
killzone3是渣
我16:27:08
还没出吧
16:27:17
有试玩
16:27:22
可多人
16:28:35
手感太飘了，30fps都不到。。。

posted by wap, platform: Nokia (E71)

两个都很优秀。。不过这评论的切入点只能说是田忌赛马了。。
另外这两游戏的美工都颇烂的。。
当然这个是不能量化的。。

本帖最后由 倍舒爽 于 2011-2-7 23:02 通过手机版编辑

posted by wap, platform: Firefox

KZ3的试玩玩了一下午，太爽了

[ 本帖最后由 FIFA09 于 2011-2-8 00:59 编辑 ]

到底谁更好 一目了然
直接看枪就可以 弯全两个级别