感觉党可以无视:D
http://sonove.angry.jp/Log2.html

                                   

	nano 6th				iPhone4	iPod touch 1st gen		Sony X1060
Frequency response (from 40 Hz to 15 kHz), dB	+0.03, -0.40	Good			+0.02, -0.16	Very good		+0.28, -2.52	Average	+0.09, -0.78	Good
Noise level, dB (A)	-89.8	Good			-90.2	Very good		-89.5	Good	-89.6	Good
Dynamic range, dB (A)	89.8	Good			90.2	Very good		89.4	Good	89.5	Good
THD, %	0.028	Good			0.0068	Very good		0.046	Good	0.079	Average
THD + Noise, dB (A)	-68.3	Average			-79.4	Average		-65.9	Average	-59.7	Poor
IMD + Noise, %	0.015	Very good			0.012	Very good		0.075	Good	0.072	Good
Stereo crosstalk, dB	-57.8	Average			-72.4	Good		-65.6	Good	-44.5	Poor
IMD at 10 kHz, %	0.063	Good			0.014	Very good		0.109	Average	0.093	Good
General performance	Good	Very good			Good	Good

和hifi男人的比较
RightMark Audio Analyzer test
Testing chain: External loopback (line-out - line-in)
Sampling mode: 16-bit, 44 kHz

HM-601 vs HM-801(GameAmp) vs  iPhone4@16ohm Load
Summary

Test	HiFiMAN HM-602	iPhone4	HiFiMAN HM-801 GameAmp
Frequency response (from 40 Hz to 15 kHz), dB:	+0.21, -2.21	+0.02, -0.16	+0.29, -2.41
Noise level, dB (A):	-84.4	-90.2	-90.4
Dynamic range, dB (A):	86.6	90.2	90.0
THD, %:	0.123	0.0068	0.018
IMD + Noise, %:	0.162	0.012	0.018
Stereo crosstalk, dB:	-51.7	-72.4	-73.8

看不懂客观音质参数

表格有点问题，换一个图片版的

[ 本帖最后由 akilla 于 2010-12-3 11:46 编辑 ]

posted by wap, platform: iPhone

耳机大家电。。。

不怕神一样的对手 就怕猪一样不会贴图的队友

IP4果然超越X1060了~~下一个目标是啥~MD？

posted by wap, platform: Motorola Milestone

为啥没有touch4的参数？

it4 的推力太小了阿....
不知道iphone是不是也是推力这么小

意思是D50党加2000上IP4?

posted by wap, platform: iPhone

其实各家都有技术储备，比水果好的也有，但都想留着慢慢出，苹果愣头青，上来就把几年后的东西拿出来了，别的厂商临时改策略还需要时间反应，当初索尼干翻老任不也是这样么？老任前几年才刚开窍，总知对客户都是有好处的

虾米含义
看不懂
不是音响神棍一族呀

别的俺不懂。同样耳机ip4比HTC desire听歌音质好忒多了

posted by wap

那电池…醒醒吧 Ip4的成本大头不是在音频上的

jobs群魔乱舞

posted by wap, platform: iPhone

还是数据说话给力，不少神耳朵听ip4觉得渣，呵呵
我反正觉得够用了，家里其他mp3全部吃灰...