最近在代老板审人家提交的国家自然基金的申请，全都是关于蛋白质折叠计算的。

看得烦死，超级计算机那是相当的重要啊

没游戏玩可以看电影，没电影看可以救人！:D

引用:

原帖由 west2046 于 2007-5-22 15:19 发表
没游戏玩可以看电影，没电影看可以救人！:D

真毒。。。。。

有英文新闻原文么？ ms看看了内容和帖子标题完全不搭界那

Folding@Home 跨平台了，是不是也变成二流。 要是 ps3运算不如 xo。Folding@Home是不是 不入流了。

http://kotaku.com/gaming/sharing ... dinghome-262053.php

原文骂得更难听

http://www.gamepro.com/news.cfm?article_id=112410

GP: Folding@Home has been a big success. There have been rumors that Microsoft wants to participate, too. Aside from any medical benefit that it might produce, would it be smart from a business standpoint for Microsoft to do join in considering the under-power of the Xbox 360 CPU compared to the PS3's Cell?

JT: I think what's very important to us, and I think is great for our consumers, is the pride that it gives you as a company to say that we're helping to fight and research Alzheimer's and that 250K people signed up in less than 60 days. And what we're doing takes 30 times longer on a PC, and that's a great testament to the PS3, but it's more a real feel-good thing to take your machine when it's idle to help contribute to that cause.

So if other companies can help contribute to that, I think that's great. But let's face it, if your motivation is for PR, to me, that's a little shallow. We go out of our way, correctly so, to make sure that we don't try to sell PS3s on Folding@Home. We try to look at it for just what it is, which is great community service for a great cause, and I think to look at it as a marketing platform is something that a company certainly wouldn't want to do. I'm certainly not insinuating that's Microsoft's motivation, but I'm not even sure how relevant it is to what were doing.

Would they be even having this conversation if we weren't doing it? I don't know. I would guess that the medical community would take help from anywhere they could get it, but the commentary that I heard is that Stanford isn't sure that [the Xbox 360's processing abilities] would help them very much, which is odd to be because if it helped at all, it seems like they would welcome it with open arms.

It's really ugly territory to get into, but let's take fighting a disease and see if we can get some credit for that. It's not a cool game to play one way or the other, so I don't want to even give the impression that that's our motivation and I'd be very disappointed if they're looking for PR value or to try to suck off some of the goodwill that we're doing.

蛋疼

[ 本帖最后由 藕是张力 于 2007-5-22 16:44 编辑 ]

索尼為德rp有問題，明明是一個公益項目也要獨占，說穿了公益項目還是要營造PS3的"道德形象"啊。
什麼嘴臉，乾脆要史丹福大學把PC 上的支援也砍了!!

什麼幾年前的P4還在死撐算蛋白質，要算蛋白質就是要用PS3才是道德滿載啊...。

干脆让可爱的天堂教徒也把他们的主机贡献出来吧.
可是我想那英明的教主比较低调不爱现,所以也不一定肯.
至于三红鸡...哎,虽然本意是好的,可那不是会死得更多吗?

[ 本帖最后由 ffcactus 于 2007-5-22 17:02 编辑 ]

引用:

原帖由 ffcactus 于 2007-5-22 17:00 发表
干脆让可爱的天堂教徒也把他们的主机贡献出来吧.
可是我想那英明的教主比较低调不爱现,所以也不一定肯.
至于三红鸡...哎,虽然本意是好的,可那不是会死得更多吗?

做饭做到这么无耻，也算少见了。。。
本来一个公益事业，越多人参加越好，你却跑来冷嘲热讽
不过话说回来，真跟你主子一个德性，这索饭，当的好！！！

真索尼无双4帝国

SONY 就是不厚道

第一次看到这么多反索饭承认这个是“公益事业”、“做贡献”……

哦，原来是因为ms也要参与进来了……

[ 本帖最后由 张国志老师 于 2007-5-22 18:09 编辑 ]

引用:

原帖由 张国志老师 于 2007-5-22 18:07 发表
第一次看到这么多反索饭承认这个是“公益事业”、“做贡献”

好不容易想到的噱头眼看被ms搞成公益事业了，sony能不急么。

引用:

原帖由 123321456 于 2007-5-22 18:10 发表

好不容易想到的噱头眼看被ms搞成公益事业了，sony能不急么。

做饭做到这么无耻，也算一绝